Brandi Glanville made a cameo last night on the third part of The Real Housewives of Beverly Hills reunion.
Glanville recited like a vengeful mean girl, being gifted with a desperate five minutes in a back alley spotlight. The Bravo castoff’s rant was a follow to a real time blurt on Twitter — with a different Housewife in Brandi’s crosshairs. Viewers will remember that Glanville is entrenched in a legal battle with Joanna Krupa, after making a crude insult about her lady parts.
The verbal diarrhea against the Real Housewives of Miami alum, went down during a 2013 Watch What Happens Live episode. If you recall, Glanville impulsively blurted out that Mohamed Hadid told her that Joanna‘s lady parts reeked. Mohamed is the ex-husband of Yolanda Foster, and father of Yolanda‘s three children, Gigi, Bella, and Anwar.
In response, Krupa filed a defamation lawsuit against Glanville in January of 2015.
According to the papers filed, Glanville “knowingly made false and malicious statements that Mrs. Krupa had sexual relations with Mohamed Hadid while Mr. Hadid was in an intact marriage to Yolanda Foster.”
Glanville has indicated a desire to make nice with Krupa, undoubtedly because of the ongoing burden of legal bills. Krupa obviously isn’t feeling the same sentiment. Glanville lashed out on Twitter Monday, again confusing a boundary between frustration, and aggressive action.
Would have been cheaper to just hire a hit man #lawyer fees 🔫
— Brandi Glanville (@BrandiGlanville) May 2, 2016
Bravo routinely allows Glanville a sanctioned spotlight to rant against anyone who doesn’t buy her unfiltered desperation. Krupa said enough, and is making the bigmouth pay. To cite a “hit man,” even in jest, as a way to dig out from under bills, is evidence of a thought process going off the rails. I hope that Krupa’s lawyers are watching.